St Andrews Bay Development (Kingask)
Issues raised during turbulent planning phase more
Planning Phase News more general
Kingask News back to
Local News
Councillor speaks out on Kingask plan
The Courier, 25 January 1999
Yesterday North-East Fife Liberal Democrat councillor Andrew
Arbuckle entered the debate which has been raging over plans for a £50
million golf, hotel, conference and leisure development at Kingask.
Last week members of the councils east area
development committee continued plans from St Andrews Bay Development Ltd for
the development on the coast to the east of St Andrews.
The plans had been recommended for approval by area
planning manager Jim Birrell, but the committee was told in no uncertain terms
by a traffic engineer that the number of traffic movements likely
to be generated - around 750 per day in St Andrews - would be in conflict with
the agreed St Andrews Transportation Plan.
It was decided this should be investigated further and that
the developers should be asked to scale down the proposals and relocate the
development to the steading which was the subject of original outline
consent.
Yesterday Mr Arbuckle said he was able to comment because
he is not a development committee member and therefore is not part of the
decision-making process.
A lot has been said both for and against this
development, but it has to be remembered that vast amounts of work and council
resources have gone into forming the towns transportation plan, and a I
so the recently-completed strategic study, he said.
Everyone want to see sensible economic development,
but not at the expense of bringing St Andrews to a point where at certain times
of the day it could grind to a halt.
If something could be done along the lines of the
original outline consent, local people - and indeed national organisations who
currently oppose these plans - would be a lot happier.
more Planning Phase
News more general Kingask
News back to Local
News up to Top |