Future of Kingsbarns Have your say about the recently 'identified' development
proposals for Kingsbarns and Cambo more Planning
Issues back to Local
Issues back to Kingsbarns
Community Council
Consultation
Information
Latest News
- Structure plan challenge
advanced - 3 day case starts 19 January at the Court of Session in
Edinburgh - open to public
- Key
body backs legal challenge to Fife plan - Association for the
Protection of Rural Scotland (APRS) lends support
- Court
case warning to council - as regards successful legal challenge impact
on policy and the local plan process
- £30,000 pledged to Fife
plan challenge - which, if successful, could stop the structure plan in
its tracks
- Fife
estate secures cash for housing - private landlord Peter Erskine could
receive up to £677,400 from public purse
- Residents legal challenge
to structure plan - controversial developers charter
to be examined in Court of Session
- Another
new distillery - can they work? - doubts about 'hopeful' plan to
produce whisky on Cambo Estate by June 2011
- Countrys biggest housing
project in disarray - Scotland's most hated house building project
under near universal attack
- Public
plan consultation - official, statutory, fully accountable consultation
not expected until June, at the earliest
- Seeking
further ideas over housing plans - back to drawing board for Local Plan
- where do you want houses, if any?
- Local
plan process restarts - the position in September 2008
- Plans
revealed for resort at Fife estate - which could lead to the creation
of a global resort at Cambo, apparently
- Council
resists army of opposition to 30,000-home development - read the
story
St Andrews & East Fife Local Plan 2009 Consultation
- have your say before 24 December 2009
Fife Council (FC) is inviting comment on the latest
consultative draft of the emerging local plan, which sets policy for
housing, environmental and other matters.
The plan 'identifies' housing sites - in our case a 40 house, greenfield site, appended to Kingsbarns.
Apparently, this is our allocated contribution, based on
anticipated mixed-housing need for the entire St Andrews
Housing Market Area, to 2026.
This landowner-promoted scheme will, if given
the go-ahead, be implemented in two (10 followed by 30 house) phases,
relatively early in the overall timeframe.
This is not the type of "smaller scale, organic growth
to meet local need" development which is to be encouraged in some other small
'Wider Fife Settlements'.
The 'identified' site, KIN 01, lies within a large landward
area of farmland, currently designated as an Area of Great Landscape Value
(AGLV). According to the plan, FC intends to eliminate this particular AGLV.
Current protective policy will no longer apply to future development west
of the village.
In 1970, all of Kingsbarns was chosen as one of three
'pilot' conservation areas because it had "remained substantially intact and
unspoilt" over the years, and it is currently an outstanding conservation area
in entirety. But, the conservation area will not be extended to include KIN
01. Whilst protective policy will continue to control development in the
conservation area, it will not apply to any development in the 'identified'
appended site.
KIN 01 - West of Square - Greenfield site for 40
houses outwith the conservation area in an AGLV.
The recent '2009 Survey' showed that the majority of
residents oppose the location of the 'identified' site. The proportion of
villagers who say that there should be 'no more than 20 houses'
has risen from 49% (2005 Survey) to 61% (2009 Survey). Permission exists for at
least 10 new houses in and around the village. Potential exists for further
brownfield development. Is there a 'need' for greenfield
development?
In proposing this site, it could be argued that Fife
Council has failed to take account of the facts that:
- "We are firmly of the view that any housing
development in our village should be of an 'organic', incremental nature, and
we wish to avoid any greenfield development." - Kingsbarns Community
Council (KCC) response to FC - October 2007.
- "The community overwhelmingly rejected" the
original 'identified' site H9 West of Square (now part of KIN 01) - KCC
response to FC, after extensive consultation at the first draft plan
stage.
- The site "should not be put forward as possible
development site. ... development of this site would remove the rural aspect of
the heart of this settlement." - according to FC surveyors who conducted
Local Plan site appraisals for all 11 possible sites in and around Kingsbarns
in 2005.
- Development west of the square "will make a huge
impact in the heart of our beautiful village." - statement from the site's
own promoter in support of one possible, speculative, housing proposal.
- "Kingsbarns is extremely compact and of integrated
development ... . It is to a continuation of this atmosphere that a
conservation policy must be named." - FC statement in support of the
proposal to put Kingsbarns forward as a pilot conservation area in 1970.
We have been here before.
In response to a 1989 proposal to site housing west of the
square ('indicated' in a draft of our current Largo & East Neuk LP), Cllr.
Mike Scott-Hayward stated that "the community of Kingsbarns, generally
speaking, appear to be set against the development of the Station Road site.
The main reasons for this would seem to hinge on the fact that this actually
does spoil an important part of the village and intrudes into what can be seen
as an indent in the boundary of the conservation area. The spirit of the
conservation area, it seems to me, would be to preserve the character of the
village, particularly along this older boundary. The site is particularly
sensitive as it is close to the older housing, the very characteristic village
square, the church and the pub."
Cllr. Scott-Hayward went on to suggest, at the time, that
the site be deleted from the draft LP and that FC look at other sites for
housing in the village, if it is necessary. The site was then deleted from the
plan.
If you feel that the current 'identified' site should
be deleted from the emerging plan, or that there are other sites more suitable
for housing, if it is necessary, then it is not too late to say so. FC
is more likely to take account of concerns if they are raised as reasoned
objections. e.g. I object to x because y.
View the plan at http://lpconsult.fife.gov.uk/portal/fsaeflp09
Comments can be made online, or sent to:
EFLP2a, Fife Council, FREEPOST RRKT-TTSR-KBYU, Development
Services, Town House, 2 Wemyssfield, Kirkcaldy, KY1 1XW
You should also raise concerns with the community council.
According to FC "representations ... will be fully
considered over the coming months and will influence whether, and where,
changes may be made to the Local Plan." We shall see.
Send Feedback here
Larger-scale 'strategic' regional-need growth or
Smaller-scale 'organic' local-need growth - which do we deserve?
Kingsbarns lies within the St Andrews & NE Fife
Housing Market Area (HMA), as defined in the Fife Structure Plan (FSP). Any new
housing in any of the towns and small communities in this large region,
stretching from Newport to Upper Largo, will effectively contribute to the
overall HMA requirement. 
According to the FSP, three 'Strategic Land
Allocation' (SLA) areas (as shown on map) will provide "the focus for
mixed-use development" within the HMA - mostly larger scale greenfield
development.
Also contributing to the overall HMA housing mix will be
'identified' "smaller scale development" in 'Wider Fife
Settlements', where "the approach will be one of organic growth to meet
local needs" and where "priority will be placed on developments that reuse
brownfield land."
Clearly, the bulk of development is being 'allocated' to
communities within designated SLA's. And this affects us. For reasons unknown,
Kingsbarns has been placed within the 'East Neuk Settlements' SLA, where policy
allows for 'strategic', regional need, larger scale, greenfield development -
in other words more than our fair share, in the wrong places. Perhaps we
shouldn't be expected to absorb so much of this kind of development. It could
be argued (see below) that Kingsbarns is wrongly placed within the SLA, that we
are in fact a 'Wider Fife Settlement', and that we should therefore contribute
to the overall housing mix accordingly - by providing local need, organic,
smaller scale, brownfield development.
So, should Kingsbarns have been placed in the 'East Neuk
Settlements' SLA? Kingsbarns lies within the current Largo & East Neuk
Local Plan area. However, that plan covers a large area, and it includes many
settlements, like Kingsbarns, which lie outwith 'The East Neuk' itself.
Kingsbarns is not officially listed, in that current plan, as being an East
Neuk Settlement. In fact, until it surfaced as such in this latest draft of the
emerging local plan, Kingsbarns had never been listed as an East Neuk
Settlement in any Structure Plan documentation, or in any earlier drafts of the
emerging local plan. During earlier consultations and 'Have Your Say' sessions,
Kingsbarns was grouped with St Andrews and not with the East Neuk. In response
to a Kingsbarns Community Council request for an official view on the matter,
the Minutes of Sept 2007 show that Fife Council then confirmed that Kingsbarns
is not an East Neuk Settlement.
Perhaps FC should tell us why, and when, Kingsbarns was
included in the East Neuk Settlement SLA. Otherwise, how can we be sure that FC
did not simply 'place' Kingsbarns in the East Neuk Settlement SLA so as to
conveniently facilitate a 'promoted' development proposal; a development
proposal which would otherwise fail to meet the rather more restrictive "Wider
Fife Settlement" policy? That would suit the promoter and Fife Council, but
would such development best serve our community needs?
Send Feedback here
7 September 2009 - Rural Homes for Rent Pilot
Scheme
According to the Scottish Government, the Rural Homes for
Rent Pilot Scheme funds additional new-build affordable housing for rent in
rural Scotland. We are told that grant funding is targeted at landowners
in pressured rural housing markets where registered social landlords have been
constrained in meeting local housing and homelessness need. The first round
of funding was oversubscribed, but twelve projects have now been awarded a
share of the £5m grant fund so as to provide 75 new properties for rent
in rural Scotland.
The Scottish Rural Property and Business Association (SRPBA)
- the re-branded Scottish Landowners Association - was heavily involved in the
early development, promotion and administration of this scheme, so it is
perhaps not altogether surprising that several prominent landowners succeeded
in securing grant funding.
Local landowner Peter Erskine applied for grant funding
for two separate sites, one in Kingsbarns (for a proposal which is judged by
some to be highly questionable,
premature and basically
flawed - see below) and one in Crail.
The Kingsbarns (landlord promoted) application was approved
but the Crail (landlord/Crail 2020 Committee promoted) application was
rejected. Both sites are in the same Local Housing Strategy (LHS) area - whose
boundary coincides with that of the existing Largo and East Neuk Local Plan.
Should Peter Erskine have been eligible for grant
funding under the scheme?
The scheme aims to provide a financial 'incentive' to
landowners in order to open up an extra source of land which owners might
otherwise be unwilling to sell or 'release' for housing - in areas with an
acute need for such housing.
Given that Peter Erskine required no such incentive -
he had already indicated to Fife Council that he was prepared to release (to
the local plan allocation) land west of the square
for a mixture of 70 housing units (far in excess of that required for local
need), long before the incentive scheme was announced - it may concern some
to learn that not only did Peter Erskine apply to the scheme, he was deemed
eligible and he succeeded in securing grant funding for 10 affordable homes for
rent. The maximum grant available to Peter Erskine is £677,400 - based on
an average of 4.6 bed-spaces per home.
It could be argued that this proposal is
premature and not fully developed (for the purposes of the grant
application), and that it should therefore have been held over for
consideration at a later date. The SRPBA is known to be urging the Scottish
Government "to look at bringing forward second round funding as a matter of
urgency" for, amongst others, those "who have not developed their proposals in
time for first round funding consideration."
When applying, grant applicants were supposed to provide
the Scottish Government with evidence of support from local authority planners
(such as outline planning permission) and evidence of support from the local
community.
Peter Erskine was not able to provide such evidence of
support. That didn't seem to matter in the end. In order to beat the
deadline for first round applications every official involved in the process
appears to have taken the view that, in this case, there would be no need for
Peter Erskine to first:
- gain community support - previous survey indicated
overwhelming rejection of proposal - new survey being undertaken
- take account of local plan consultation - where
residents would have first fully accountable say as regards chosen site
- await an 'adopted' local plan whose policy allows such
housing - proposed site is currently agricultural land in an AGLV
- gain outline planning approval - rather dependant, of
course, on the outcome of the local plan process
In his application to the Scottish Government, Peter Erskine
stated that it was estimated that planning approval would be in place by July
2009, road construction consents would be in place by August 2009, work would
start in January 2010 and be complete by March 2011. But community consultation
will not take place until October 2009, at the earliest, for a period of 6
weeks.
It will be interesting to see how the democratic process
copes with this cart before horse situation.
It could be argued that this proposal is basically
flawed.
Early in the application process, at the 'expression of
interest' stage, Peter Erskine provided the Scottish Government with Fife
Council derived support documents which wrongly placed Kingsbarns in the St
Andrews LHS area, a 'highest' need area with 19.1% (1828 actual) households in
need of affordable housing. Kingsbarns is in fact in the Largo and East Neuk
LHS area, a 'high' housing area with 8.1% (558 actual) households in need of
affordable housing. That fact was only made known to the Scottish Government
after official assessment and determination of the 'expression of
interest' proposals.
In the absence of the correct information during 'expression
of interest' assessment and determination, the Scottish government would have
been unaware of the fact that Kingsbarns already provides more social rented
housing (13.99%) than the Largo and East Neuk LHS area average (12.37%), and
significantly more social rented housing than area neighbour Crail (8.70%).
Peter Erskine and his supporters were, at a critical
stage in the application process, overstating the need for affordable housing
in Kingsbarns to a significant extent. Not only that, the Scottish Government
was being led to believe that no other sites were available to meet need in the
area - when the opposite was the case.
Bear in mind that Kingsbarns is in the same LHS area as
Crail - Largo and East Neuk. When asked whether or not the 'expression of
interest' application for Crail met the criteria for social housing, officials
from Fife Council indicated to the Scottish Government that within the Largo
and East Neuk LHS area "there are other land opportunities available." In their
letter of rejection of the Crail application the Scottish Government stated
that "the proposed scheme was deemed a lesser priority for the Pilot following
discussions with Fife Council where your project was given a lower priority.
This was as a result of housing need being met through other proposed
developments by local RSLs [Registered Social Landlords]." In order to avoid
confusion here, bear in mind that the Scottish Government was assessing
applications according to LHS area need, and it was being told that Kingsbarns
was in another LHS area, so those "other proposed developments" could not have
included any in Kingsbarns.
Had Kingsbarns been placed in the correct housing market
area, the Scottish Government would surely have had no choice but to reject the
Kingsbarns 'expression of interest' application - for the same reasons as those
cited for Crail.
This website has obtained a great deal of information
regarding this grant application - from Fife Council and from the Scottish
Government. Some of this information has been forwarded to Kingsbarns Community
Council - most of the information will be published here ahead of the official
Local Plan consultation phase.
Peter Erskine is also Chairman of Kingsbarns Community
Council, and this has caused concern re conflict of interest.
If you are concerned about this whole scheme you might be
interested in supporting the Legal challenge to the
Structure Plan
13 July 2009 -
Legal challenge to the
Fife Structure Plan 2006 - 2026
Future development in Kingsbarns will be controlled
according to policy contained within the forthcoming St Andrew & East Fife
Local Plan. That plan will be based on policy contained within the recently
approved Fife Structure Plan 2006 - 2026.
During the consultation phase the structure plan was
described by many as a developers charter, and it ran into
unprecedented objection, much of it from north-east Fife. As it evolved, the
plan was the subject of often bitter debate and controversy.
Now, a campaigning St Andrews resident has just gone right
to the top of Scotlands legal system with a challenge to the Fife
Structure Plan in the Court of Session.
Legal papers have been lodged by Penny Uprichard. She could
end up with a bill of tens of thousands of pounds, but has already received
pledges amounting to £17,000 [£30,000 by mid
August, £35,500
by November] towards possible legal costs of the action - prompted
mainly by her concern over development plans for St Andrews.
Miss Uprichard has called on bodies such as the
preservation trust - which she says has considerable assets and a history of
defending the town - to back her as she takes on the might of the Scottish
ministers who approved the structure plan after a lengthy delay.
Miss Uprichard said the legal challenge will probably take
months to come to court, and during that time she will be fund-raising to meet
possible costs.
She said that pledges would only be called in if necessary,
and anyone signing pledge forms would only be responsible for that amount, and
their confidentiality would be respected.
Further information, and printable pledge form here
17 Feb 2009 - North-east Fife area committee chairman
Councillor Andrew Arbuckle has circulated community councils in the area to ask
for their suggestions about how the council can disperse houses throughout
villages and hamlets.
The call has come in a letter sent by Mr Arbuckle as
consultation - and a degree of confusion - continues over the long-awaited St
Andrews and East Fife Local Plan, which will provide a blueprint for future
development in conjunction with Fife's controversial structure plan. In his
letter Mr Arbuckle said that a great deal of concern has been expressed over
the number of houses that might be built in the area in the 20-year life span
of the structure plan. He said:
"The government expects there to be a rise in
the number of people living in northeast Fife and further believes that the
trend to single people living in a house will continue to rise. Accordingly it
wants to see more land allocated for housing.
"Bearing in mind the current recession, and
indeed the assumptions on which the additional housing allocation has been
made, there are questions about whether the housing will be built. However we
are required to have an up-to-date local plan with a minimum five-year housing
land supply.
"In conjunction with your local councillors, I
have expressed a view that officers draw up plans to disperse the numbers of
houses throughout the whole of northeast Fife.
"Such a dispersal policy will also allow
smaller hamlets and villages some scope for expansion without swamping any
community."
Mr Arbuckle said that he was writing to clarify the
position in relation to letters sent out by the council, and also to provide a
proposed future timetable.
He said that the local plan will include proposals for
development sites over the next 10 years. Development services staff are
working on the next version of the plan. He added:
"Some of you have already passed views to the
service, and any such views are being taken into account.
"There is, however, still an opportunity for
your community to express its views on where it would prefer to see
development- or indeed if it does not want any development."
The councillor said that the next draft of the local
plan will be brought to the May meeting of the north-east Fife area committee
for comment, prior to going to Fife Council in June.
In autumn the 2009 version will be published for
individuals and communities to provide their comments. It is seen as inevitable
that unresolved objections will lead to a public inquiry.
Views on future development can be put to Fife
councillors or to martin.mcgroarty.fife.gov.uk.
Housing Policy
Future development in Kingsbarns will be controlled
according to policy contained within the forthcoming St Andrew & East Fife
Local Plan. That plan will be based on policy contained within the new Fife
Structure Plan 2006 -2016. The new Fife Structure Plan has attracted huge
levels of criticism, right across the board - and it is now subject to
challenge
in the Court of Session.
In the FFSP, Fife Council has identified:
- Strategic Land Allocation Areas - for larger scale
strategic development - "largely .... on greenfield land"
- Wider Fife Settlements - for organic, local need, smaller
scale development - with "priority ... on reuse of brownfield land"
There are significant differences in policy controlling
development in identified Strategic Land Allocation Areas (strategic -
predominately greenfield) and the surrounding Wider Fife Settlements (organic,
local need - predominately brownfield.)
Fife Council has identified greenfield land for significant
development in Kingsbarns. That would seem to suggest that Kingsbarns lies
within a Strategic Land Allocation Area - but does it?
There are two ' Strategic Land Allocation Areas' near
Kingsbarns - 'East Neuk Settlements' and 'St Andrews West'
There is no definitive listing of the East Neuk Settlements
in the FFSP. Proposal PH2 suggests that the East Neuk, for the purposes of
development control, consists of Crail, Cellardyke, Anstruther and Pittenweem.
Various maps in the FFSP show an 'Other Strategic Land Allocation' running
along the coast from Crail to Elie.
For months residents of Kingsbarns had been trying to
establish whether or not the village was being regarded, for planning purposes,
as an 'East Neuk Settlement'.
Fife Council then confirmed that Kingsbarns is not an 'East
Neuk Settlement', as defined in the Structure Plan [Kingsbarns Community
Council Minutes, Sept 2007.]
Fife Council also confirmed that "Kingsbarns is not in the
'St Andrews West Strategic Land Allocation' area" [Response from Jim Henry to
Secretary KCC, 10 Sept 2007.]
So, by definition (according to the FFSP):
Kingsbarns is a 'Wider Fife Settlement' where we can
expect:
"smaller scale development which will be identified through
Local Plans. The approach for these settlements will be one of organic growth
to meet local needs for both housing and employment. Again, priority will be
placed on developments that reuse brownfield land and contribute to
regeneration" [FFSP, 2.6 'Wider Fife Settlements']
Housing Proposals
Housing Site KIN 01 - latest proposed site as
identified in the St
Andrews and East Fife Local Plan 2009
Revised in name only - basically the same as h32 below - but
now the site has Strategic Housing Allocation
status
Housing Site h32 - proposed site as 'identified' in
the St Andrews & East
Fife Finalised Draft Local Plan 2006
Site comprises parts of:
EFLP 04 -
KIN006 West of Square - arable land which "should not be put forward
as possible development site" for housing, where any such housing
development "would remove the rural aspect of the heart of this
settlement" - [Fife Council], and;
EFLP 04 - KIN011
North of Station Road - agricultural land with limited potential for
housing, where any such development "could breach the skyline to the west
especially." - [Fife Council]
According to Kingsbarns Community Council minutes of 4
September 2006:
"In January 2005 the East Fife Local Plan had proposed 110
new houses (70+40) across two potential sites h48 & h49. .......
"The chair reported that the new approved plan [actually the
second draft or 'finalised' 2006 version of the Local Plan] identified just one
area of 2.6 hectares, designated h32, for 40 houses to straddle Station Road to
the west of the village square. The Council proposal is for 10 houses to be
built during 2006-2011 with an additional 30 during 2011-2016, to total 40,
with no more to be built thereafter within the 20 year period to 2026."
Housing sites h48 & h49 - as 'identified' earlier
in the St Andrews
& East Fife Local Plan (Consultative Draft)
110 houses in Kingsbarns, on open farmland to the west of
the square and outwith the current village envelope.
Proposed housing sites (70 houses in field directly
ahead, 40 houses in field at back of
Manse) Photo Nick Lunan
The 'identified' development proposals were:
West of Square (h48) - 70 houses proposed. According
to Fife Council "records show that h48 is part of a site originally promoted by
the landowner Mr Peter Erskine."
Please note: part of h48 has now been incorporated in
revised local plan site h32 - see above
West of Glebe (h49) - 40 houses proposed. This field,
at the back of the Manse, is owned by the Church of Scotland. The origins of
this proposal are 'unclear.'
Kingsbarns Community Council carried out a
village survey
regarding:
- specific proposals - as contained in this early
consultative draft local plan, and
- general development issues raised by the community
council at that time
The survey was organised by a 'Future of Kingsbarns'
sub-committee, and it was supported by:
Kingsbarns Community Council sent the results of the survey
to Fife Council.
Other background information from earlier in the
consultation process
Fife Council Consultation (Spring 2005) - according
to Fife Council:
"You have a role to play in Shaping Fifes Future
and are encouraged to have your say on the following draft
publications"
St Andrews and East Fife Local Plan (Consultative
Draft) - This is the first of the new local plans for Fife and for the
first time is available on the FifeDirect website as an interactive plan. It
identifies where change is proposed, showing in detail the location and nature
of development from 2006-2016. This Plan is supported by the Action Plan and a
series of background papers.
Fife Structure Plan (Consultative Draft) - Fife
Matters - The Development Plan explains how and what should be developed in
Fife. It is made up of two parts - the Structure Plan and Local Plans. Fife
Matters is the Consultative Draft Structure Plan which looks at the development
of the whole of Fife over the next 20 years. This then provides the framework
for the more detailed Local Plans for St Andrews and East Fife, Kirkcaldy and
Mid Fife and Dunfermline and West Fife. The proposed main strategic development
areas where large scale development is proposed are Dunfermline, Kirkcaldy,
Glenrothes, Levenmouth and Lochgelly. Fife Matters is supported by technical
background papers, the Report of Survey, Action Plan and Sustainability
Appraisal.
Creating a better Fife - Draft Design Guide - This
draft guide sets out a Fife-wide approach to designing buildings and open
spaces. It aims to improve the standard of all future development, whilst
retaining the special character of Fifes towns and villages. It also aims
to raise awareness and interest in urban design and the contribution it can
make to creating better places and improving quality of life.
Supplementary Guidance on Affordable Housing - The
need for affordable housing is one of the main issues that has to be addressed
over the next 20 years. Fife Matters identifies where affordable housing is
needed but because affordable housing is a complex and dynamic issue, more
detailed and complementary guidance is needed to identify how this can be
delivered. This is the Affordable Housing Supplementary Guidance.
Local Transport Strategy - This sets the long- term
strategic vision for transport provision and services for the next 20 years.
The long-term goal is to create a balanced, integrated trans-port network,
which allows appropriate access to all key needs and services.
Area Transport Plans - These have been developed for
the West, Central and East Areas of Fife and set out the way that we will
deliver practical projects and services in line with the Local Transport
Strategy. The priorities of the Area Transport Plans are developed in
consultation with local communities.
Copies of all of the above draft publications are available
to view at Fife Council libraries, Local Offices and Fife Council website - try
www.fifedirect.org.uk/developmentplan
and work from there.
Most of the publications have been copied to this website,
for easy reference - follow the links below. The pdf files require acrobat
reader and some are quite large (best to 'save' or 'open in new window')
Earlier Community Consultation
East Fife Community
Consultation - between August and December 2003, 28 public events and a
number of outreach sessions were held across East Fife to inform the
development of the Local Plan and the strategies and plans of other Fife
Council Services and Community Planning partners.
EFCC Feedback -
Kingsbarns - relevant information from the initial meeting in
Boarhills.
Your Place Your
Plan - the second stage in the consultation
process for the evolving St Andrews & East Fife Local Plan.
Discussion groups explored issues such as housing, schools, facilities, town
centres, countryside matters, green belts and conservation. For the purposes of
this exercise Kingsbarns concerns were aired at the St Andrews meeting.
Fife Council has recently published the results of this
consultation exercise in two forms:
Discussion group workshop notes for all areas are available
at www.fifedirect.org.uk/newsevents
All the opinions, suggestions and ideas were passed to Fife
Council Services and partner agencies, and used to inform the recently
published draft of the St Andrews & East Fife Local Plan.
Other useful documents
Presented to Fife Council Environment and Development
Committee, 20 January 2005.
The purpose of the report is to seek members approval
for Draft Supplementary Planning Guidance on affordable housing, as a basis for
public consultation.
Presented to Fife Council Environment and Development
Committee, 20 January 2005.
Detailed guidance on the delivery of affordable housing in
Fife. This guidance should be read in conjunction with Fife
Matters, the consultative draft Structure Plan for Fife and Fifes
Local Housing Strategy (LHS). In particular the LHS forms a sound strategic
basis for meeting housing challenges in the future whilst Fife Matters
represents a bold and ambitious strategic land use planning framework for the
next 20 years.
Presented to Fife Council Environment and Development
Committee, 6 September 2004.
The purpose of the report is to advise members of the
implication of the Local Housing Strategy for land use planning including
Structure Plan and Local Plan policies and seek approval for the Councils
overall approach to addressing the need for Affordable Housing.
Presented to Fife Council East Area Services Committee, 25
August 2004.
The purpose of this report is to highlight the issues raised
by communities and also by East Fife elected members at a seminar in June 2004
and to inform Fife Councils developing Affordable Housing Policy.
Remember, if you have any thoughts on this issue, or any
local issue, please send feedback
Feedback received will be used to regulate the coverage of
this issue. more Planning Issues back to
Local Issues back to
Kingsbarns Community Council up to
Top |